Upload your lesson content and ask for an explanation at your level, followed by questions to check your understanding.
If a lecture moves quickly or has lots of terms, start with a point you don't understand and a source you can revisit. The assistant can reorganize the explanation, give a relatable example, and provide practice. Confirm understanding by trying, rather than just finding the answer easy to read.
Explanations can use your files, general fundamentals, or current research. Specify which approach you want. For an exam or specific curriculum, make its content the basis and distinguish examples or additions outside the source.
Test file quality first. Poor recordings, unreadable images, or files above supported limits may block access to information. Ask what was read and what's missing instead of assuming every file will be fully understood.
After the explanation, answer a new question. Ask for the reasoning behind the feedback and the information's source location. When an approach suits you, save instructions for your level, explanation style, and review, then test it on another topic.
Choose from what's available to you. You can use these prompts with several tools. What they can carry out depends on supported features and files.
See tool details and uses in the Tools library →You have a two-hour lecture recording and a PDF handout. Upload them and say: “Explain this part as if I'm learning it from scratch, with an everyday example.” Before the exam, upload past papers and request questions in the same style.
Use the learning through practice workflow to test understanding without seeing the solution, then return to the source when reviewing mistakes.
Explain the idea in your own words. Ask it to identify unsupported or unclear parts, without treating its assessment as a final verdict.
Open the menu and choose what fits your inputs and desired result. The method's guide appears directly below it.
Gather lesson sources in a notebook or project. Ask for an explanation, then questions from the same content. Check answers and their source locations. Keep the answer key separate so you can test yourself first.
Try it on your work: Prepare what you'll work on and start with a small part. Review the result before continuing.
Open any step by its heading. Each explains what to do, why, and what to check before continuing.
The assistant explains better when sources are clear and readable.
The right tool can read your file types and lets you return to them.
The same topic needs different explanations for a beginner and someone reviewing.
The style should help you understand, not just change how the words look.
Solving a new question tells you more than feeling that the summary is easy.
You can review manually or use supported scheduling. Both need a clear method.
Save the context that worked instead of repeating the same instructions from scratch.
Open a prompt and fill in your details. Empty fields remain visible so you don't forget them.
Write the prompt in a conversation with the suggested tool after preparing the files listed in the steps.
Copy the prompt as it is, or tailor it with your details first.
The source and your level affect how the explanation should work. A comprehension question shows that you understood, instead of just reading a summary.
Copy the prompt as it is, or tailor it with your details first.
This is a ready-to-use example. Copy it as is, or adapt the text to your work.
Check your understanding with a new question or practical task, and check the key information against the source. An easy explanation does not guarantee a complete one.
If there's a problem, name the unsuitable part, show an example, and request a specific edit.
